Mexborough & Swinton Times – Friday 13 June 1902
Sequel to a Dance at Wombwell.
Jos. Priestley, miner, Station road, Wombwell, sued Samuel Bowen and John Wm. Bowen, also miners, of the same place, for £6 10s., damages for alleged assault.
Mr. Rideal appeared for plaintiff and Mr. J. Hewitt defended.
Fromthe evidence adduced, it appeared that on the 15th March the annual tea and dance took place at the Conservative Club, Wombwell and plaintiff, on behalf of the committee, had promised to see the end of the proccedings. Some of the people were annoyed at there being no extension of time and as they were dispersing, about 11-30, Samuel Bowen was heard to remark, “Let’s have a go at him.” Immediately afterwards, Boweu struck plaintiff on the chest with his fist, and this was followed by J. W. Bowen knocking him over a chair. While on the door, it was alleged that J. W. Bowen , kicked plaintiff, who was rendered unconscious and a doctor had to be fetched. At the time he was wearing a new suit, value over 65s.. and this was spoilt. He had been unable to resume his work for a week.
Plaintiff denied that he was a “bit of a boxer,” or that he was drunk at this time.
Wm. Robinson, a member of the club, said plaintiff was arguing with another man when the assault was committed. Plaintiff was not drank, and what he was doing was perfectly in order.
Four other witnesses gave evidence for the for the plaintiff.
Samuel Bowen denied saying, “Let’s have ago at hint.” He was trying to act as peacemaker and the plaintiff struck the first blow.
In reply to Mr. Rideal, Bowen admitted that he had been expelled from the club for fighting but had been allowed to re-join.
- W. Bowen also denied the offence.
A miner named Morgan said plaintiff struck the first blow.
The evidence was of a somewhat conflicting character, and His Honour said this appeared to be ease in which enjoyable festivities had a very unpleasant termination but he held that the evidence was so contradictory that if plaintiff liked be could take the action before a jury, in which His Honour would find a non-suit, otherwise he give a verdict for the defendant.
Mr. Rideal said he would accept a non-suit, and go before a jury.